Which surgery works best for pelvic organ prolapse? new study compares two techniques

NCT ID NCT06307873

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two surgical methods—sacrospinous fixation and v-notes lateral suspension—for treating pelvic organ prolapse in 70 women aged 35-75. Researchers measured how well each surgery restored anatomy and improved quality of life. The goal is to find which approach offers better recovery and fewer complications.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

surgical procedure (sacrospinous fixation or v-notes lateral suspension)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves better, it could lead to improved surgical outcomes and quality of life for women with pelvic organ prolapse.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 70 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Surgery always carries risks like infection or recurrence.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENITAL PROLAPSE, UNSPECIFIED are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse prolapse of female genital organ

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)