Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Microscope vs. loupes: which makes root canals faster?

NCT ID NCT07304869

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 25, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This completed study looked at 102 people needing root canal treatment on a back upper molar. Dentists used either direct vision, magnifying loupes, or a dental microscope to see better during the procedure. The goal was simply to measure how long each step took, not to test a new treatment or improve health outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

102 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Feb 2025

Finished

Oct 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients admitted to the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uşak University, who required root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth

Ages

12 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients requiring root canal treatment of the maxillary first molar tooth Exclusion Criteria: * Previous root canal treatment on the maxillary first molar tooth * Presence of fracture or crack in the maxillary first molar tooth * Lack of indication for completing treatment in a single session * Patient refusal to continue treatment during the procedure * Indication for extraction due to complications during treatment * Teeth indicated for fiber post restoration due to excessive material loss

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Root canal therapy are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

    Uşak, 64000, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.