Experimental drug rigosertib tested against aggressive skin cancer in rare disease patients
NCT ID NCT03786237
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This small early-phase trial tested an experimental drug called rigosertib in just 2 people with a rare blistering skin disease (recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa) who also had advanced skin cancer. The goal was to see if the drug could shrink tumors and whether it was safe. Rigosertib was given as oral capsules or intravenous infusions. Because only 2 patients took part, the results are very limited and cannot be generalized.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- rigosertib (oral capsules or intravenous infusion)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a treatment for advanced skin cancer in people with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small, early-phase trial with only 2 patients, so results may not apply to others. The drug may not shrink tumors or could cause side effects.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 1/2
Runs two stages together: safety and dose first, then whether the treatment works.
- Participants
-
2 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2021
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 79 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. 18-79 years of age; 2. Diagnosis of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic SCC confirmed prior to the Screening Visit. 3. Failure to respond to RDEB SCC standard of care, such as surgical excision, radiotherapy or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy with e.g. platin derivates (i.e. cisplatin or carboplatin), 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, methotrexate, adriamycin, taxanes, gemcitabine or ifosfamide alone or in combination or failure to respond to previous alternative biologic treatments such as epidermal growth factor inhibitors (like cetuximab and panitumumab) or immune checkpoint (programmed cell death 1\) inhibitors (such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab). For recent guidelines on standard of care for RDEB SCC and non EB-SCC please see Mellerio et al., 2016; Stratigos et al., 2015 and Kim et al., 2018. 4. Is not currently receiving any other cancer therapy. 5. Measurable disease based on Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) 6. Patient (or patient's legally authorized representative) must have signed an informed Exclusion Criteria 1. Response to standard of care. 2. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris. 3. Active systemic infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy. 4. Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (≥5.3 mg/dL in patients if related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease). 5. Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN). 6. Serum creatinine ≥2 .0 mg/dL or eGFR (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) \<60mL/min. 7. White blood cell count ≤ 2000/μl, neutrophils ≤ 1500/μL, platelets ≤ 100 x103/μL, hemoglobin ≤ 7.9 g/dL. 8. Known active HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, where active is defined as follows: a. HIV or Hepatitis C - presence of viral load; b. Hepatitis B - antigen positive 9. Uncorrected hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<125 mmol/L). 10. Male patients with partners of child-bearing potential who are unwilling to use male contraception (condom) throughout the study, up to and including the 30-day nontreatment follow-up period. 11. Female subjects: pregnant or lactating women and all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant (i.e. women of childbearing potential) UNLESS they are willing to use one or more highly effective and reliable methods of contraception with a Pearl index ≤1 including combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral or intravaginal or transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral or injectable or implantable); an intrauterine device (IUD); an intrauterine hormone-releasing system ( IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised partner (provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP trial participant and that the vasectomised partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success) or sexual abstinence (The reliability of sexuality abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Reliable contraception should be maintained throughout the study. A pregnancy test in serum will be performed at screening in all women of childbearing potential, and in urine at all visits. Any postmenopausal women (physiologic menopause defined as "12 consecutive months of amenorrhea") or women permanently sterilized (e.g. tubal occlusion, hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy) will not be required to undergo pregnancy test. 12. Uncontrolled hypertension. (i.e.. systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90mmHg despite intake of ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications with complementary mechanisms of action (a diuretic should be 1 component); (Whelton et al., 2018). 13. Patient is currently participating and receiving study therapy or systemic therapy or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment. 14. Psychiatric illness or social situation that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements. 15. Patients (or parents in case of paediatric subject) unlikely to comply with the study protocol or unable to understand the nature and scope of the study or the possible benefits or unwanted effects of the study procedures and treatments. 16. History or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the study, interfere with the patient's participation for the full duration of the study, or is not in the best interest of the patient to participate, in the opinion of the treating Investigator. 17. Known hypersensitivity reaction to any of the components of study treatment. 18. Presence of clinically significant ECG abnormalities based on the inverstigator´s criteria.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
EB House Austria/Dept. of Dermatology University Hospital
Salzburg, State of Salzburg, 5020, Austria
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can an immunotherapy combo shrink sinonasal tumors before surgery?
- Can a laser microscope diagnose skin cancer faster?
- Can a shorter radiation course tame side effects in head and neck cancer?
- Can Pre-Surgery immunotherapy prime the immune system to fight head and neck cancer?
- Glowing cancer cells: a new way to see tumors during surgery?
- Botox before the knife: could a Pre-Surgery injection lead to Better-Looking scars?