Birthmark removal may boost Kids' Well-Being, study hopes to prove
NCT ID NCT02280889
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at children with congenital melanocytic nevi (large birthmarks) who choose to have them surgically removed. Researchers want to see if removal improves quality of life and reduces feelings of being stigmatized. About 100 children aged 9 months to 16 years will be followed before and after surgery using questionnaires and interviews.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical excision
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could provide evidence that surgical removal of congenital moles improves children's quality of life and reduces feelings of stigma.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. Results may not apply to all children, and surgery carries risks like scarring or complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 100 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
May 2013
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2031
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
All patients with CMN of at least 2 square centimeter (projected adult size) that are scheduled for surgical removal of the CMN at our tertiary center for pediatric surgery.
- Ages
-
9 months to 16 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * patients with a congenital melanocytic nevi of at least 2 cm2 that will be removed surgically * age between 9 months and 16 years Exclusion Criteria: * mental retardation of the child * insufficient knowledge of the German language of both parents * severe comorbidities * previous therapies done for the CMN (dermabrasion, surgery, laser)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Congenital melanocytic nevi are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Children's Hospital Zurich, Division of Pediatric Plastic and reconstructive Surgery
RECRUITINGZurich, 8008, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Heart Disease's hidden toll: study tracks quality of life across mind, body, and spirit
- 150,000 children to be tracked from birth to old age in massive health study
- Can a website help liver cancer patients care for themselves during chemoembolization?
- A 10-Question survey could give brazilian pulmonary hypertension patients a voice in their care
- Fewer dialysis sessions: can Twice-Weekly work as well?
- Two ways to rebuild a tongue: which one leaves patients better off?