Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a blood injection boost shoulder healing?

NCT ID NCT02173743

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 80 people with painful calcium deposits in the shoulder tendon that didn't get better with standard care. All received a needle procedure to remove the deposits, and half also got an injection of their own platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The goal was to see if adding PRP reduces pain and improves shoulder function better than the needle procedure alone.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
What this could lead to
If it works, this could offer a more effective minimally invasive treatment for calcific tendinitis, reducing the need for surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with 80 participants. Previous research on PRP for other tendon problems has shown mixed results, so it may not provide clear benefit.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

80 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2014

Finished

May 2019

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 55 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * age \> 18 yrs * clinical manifestions of tendinitis calcarea (pain, stifness, lock sensations, muscle atrophy) * persistent pain sympoms \>6 months * standardized AP x-ray shows calcific deposit of \> 5mm \& morphologic Type I \& II deposits (classification of Gärtner en Simons) * ineffective intervention \> 2 types of conservative treatment (among which are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, local anesthesia injection and/or corticosteroids, extracorporele shock wave therapy) * indication and referral for barbotage by orthopeadic surgeon Exclusion Criteria: * age \> 55 years * morphological type III deposits according to classification of Gärtner and Simons) (as indicated by standardized x-ray AP) * bigliani type III acromion, and acromial spur of acromioclavicular osteovyt * previous (ineffective) barbotage * the existence of other shoulder related injuries next to calcific tendinitis (full-thickness rupture of the rotator cuff, adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder), arthrosis of the glenohumeral- or acromioclavicalar joint * shoulder joint instability * shoulder injury due to trauma or previous shoulder surgeries * other types of disorders that could negatively influence the outcomes (rheumatic arthritis. cervical spine disorders, neurological upper extremity disorders, diabetes mellitus, infections, blood disorders, malignity, pregnancy) * known allergic responses to one of the medications applied in the current study (lidocaine, bupivacaine, kenacort) * usage of anti-coagulants other than ascal of plavix

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Calcific tendinitis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland/ZGT

    Hengelo, Overijssel, 7550 AM, Netherlands

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.