Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a 2-Week radiation blast be as good as 4 weeks for recurrent prostate cancer?

NCT ID NCT04422132

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests whether giving radiation in just 5 treatments over 2 weeks is as safe and effective as the standard 20 treatments over 4 weeks for men whose prostate cancer has come back after surgery. The 134 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two schedules. The main goal is to compare bowel and urinary side effects two years after treatment, while also tracking cancer progression and quality of life.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Radiation therapy
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a shorter 2-week radiation course is as safe and effective as the standard 4-week course, reducing treatment burden for patients.
What could go wrong
This is a phase 2 trial with only 134 participants, so results are preliminary. The shorter course might cause different side effects or be less effective at controlling cancer long-term.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 2

Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.

Participants

About 134 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Sep 2020

Expected to finish

Dec 2033

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 90 years

Sex

Male participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Men aged 18 and older with histologically confirmed prostate cancer after prostatectomy with detectable PSA. PSA does not need to be detectable for men with pathologically node positive disease. * KPS \>=70 * Patient with no evidence of distant metastatic disease on PET/CT/MRI or bone scan \< 9 months prior to enrollment. Patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes are eligible. * Ability to receive MRI-guided radiotherapy. * Equivocal evidence of metastatic disease outside the pelvis on standard imaging requires documented negative biopsy. * Ability to complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. Exclusion Criteria: * Prior history of receiving pelvic radiotherapy. * Patient with inflammatory bowel disease. * Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. * History of bladder neck or urethral stricture.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Prostate cancer are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Weill Cornell Medicine

    New York, New York, 10065, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.