New study aims to find the best way to biopsy for prostate cancer
NCT ID NCT07460843
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two prostate biopsy techniques to see which one better detects clinically significant prostate cancer. About 592 men with a suspicious MRI lesion will be randomly assigned to receive either targeted plus perilesional biopsy or targeted plus systematic biopsy. The goal is to find a method that accurately diagnoses important cancers while reducing unnecessary sampling.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- biopsy procedure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the most accurate and less invasive biopsy method for diagnosing significant prostate cancer.
- What could go wrong
- This is a diagnostic study, not a treatment trial. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and the best method may still miss some cancers.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 592 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * The age of the patient is between 18 and 85. * No previous biopsy. * Patients with single suspicious lesion, complete multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, qualified image quality control, suspicious lesions, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) of ≥ 3. * Patients were in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy, including patients with suspicious prostate nodes found by digital rectal examination (DRE), the suspicious lesions found by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) \>10ng/mL, tPSA 4-10ng/mL with free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA) \<0.16 or PSA density (PSAD) \>0.15. * The prostate biopsy pathological results were complete. The time interval between prostate biopsy and prostate mpMRI examination should not exceed one month. * Patients with complete clinical information. Exclusion Criteria: * The mpMRI data was unqualified or incomplete. * Patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or surgery treatment before prostate mpMRI examination or prostate biopsy. * Patients with previous biopsy. * Patients with PI-RADS V2.1 of \< 3. * Patients were not in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy. * The patient could not cooperate to complete the prostate biopsy. * The patients or their family members refused to participate in this study. * Patients with incomplete clinical information.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Prostate cancer (diagnosis) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Peking University First Hospital
RECRUITINGBeijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New MRI techniques could spare men from unnecessary prostate biopsies
- A sharper eye on prostate cancer return: PSMA PET vs. MRI
- AI may help spot dangerous prostate cancer and spare men from needless biopsies
- Blood test may spot prostate cancer without a needle
- AI reads scans to spot prostate cancer, spare unnecessary biopsies
- Extra numbing shot may ease pain of prostate biopsy