Sedative showdown in TBI: propofol vs midazolam study halted after just one patient
NCT ID NCT01712477
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study aimed to compare two common sedatives, propofol and midazolam, in patients with traumatic brain injury who needed a breathing tube. Researchers wanted to see if one drug led to better recovery or different levels of inflammation markers called cytokines. However, the trial was terminated early after enrolling only one person, so no meaningful conclusions could be drawn.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- propofol and midazolam
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
1 person
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Nov 2011
- Finished
-
Dec 2014
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Ages 18 Years or older * Males or Females * Primary diagnosis of TBI, subarachnoid hemmorhage (SAH), intracranial hemmorhage (ICH), stroke * Requires mechanical ventilation * Requires or is receiving continuous IV sedation Exclusion Criteria: * Glascow Coma Score (GCS) of 3 persisting from the scene with bilaterally fixed dilated pupils with no appreciable chance of survival * The inability to identify a next of kin or guardian to give consent if patient unable to consent * Pregnant * Allergy or contraindication to propofol * Allergy to contraindication to midalozam * Status epilepticus * Current neuromuscular blockade * Patient with a known hypersensitivity to propofol or midalozam * Allergies to eggs, egg products, soybeans or soy products * Acute narrow-angle glaucoma
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Intracranial hemorrhage are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sparrow Health System
Lansing, Michigan, 48912, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a checklist and heart monitor stop repeat strokes?
- Heart hole or stroke trigger? global registry tracks who gets closure and what happens next
- Zapping the spine while wearing a robotic ankle: a new way to help kids walk?
- Can a web program rebuild memory after brain injury?
- Can a nurse and a neighbor help tame chronic disease?
- Can PET scans reveal hidden heart inflammation after a stroke?