Small study compares standard vs mini kidney stone surgery
NCT ID NCT04069013
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This completed trial compared two surgical procedures for removing kidney stones: standard PCNL and mini-PCNL. The study enrolled 18 adults with stones 10-20mm and measured blood loss, complications, and recovery time. The goal was to see if the smaller incision approach offers any advantages.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one procedure proves safer or faster, it could become the preferred surgical option for kidney stones.
- What could go wrong
- This was a very small trial (18 people) and only compared two surgical techniques, not a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
18 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2022
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients planned for PCNL at participating institutions * Age ≥ 18 years old * Male and female patients * Patients of all ethnic backgrounds * Stone size 10-20mm Patients must be capable of giving informed consent and must be capable and willing to enroll and participate fully with the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Conversion to open procedure * Multiple access tracts * Anticoagulated or history of coagulopathy * Preoperative ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube placement * Technical problems/impossibility of localizing the stone on the day of intervention Patients unable to give informed consent or unwilling to enroll or participate in the study will be excluded.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Kidney calculi are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which emergency drainage gives the best kidney stone surgery results?
- Three ways to clear a blocked kidney: which works best?
- Kidney stone surgery without a hospital stay: can it be done safely?
- Two routes to clear bladder stones: which surgery works better?
- Muscle therapy may restore strength in dialysis patients
- Can software make hospital pharmacists faster and safer?