New pain block may be safer for Kids' chest surgery
NCT ID NCT07602179
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two ways to manage pain in 70 children undergoing chest surgery. One method, the erector spinae plane block, was compared to the standard epidural block. The goal was to see which provides better pain relief and keeps the heart rate and blood pressure more stable. The erector spinae block uses a numbing medicine injected near the back muscles, while the epidural is injected near the spine.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- levobupivacaine
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that erector spinae plane block is a safer, equally effective alternative to epidural for pain control in children after chest surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 70 children. Results may not apply to all surgeries or ages, and the block may not work as well for everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
70 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2023
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
4 to 16 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. * Diagnosis of pulmonary cyst, mediastinal tumor, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumor, or chest wall tumor requiring unilateral thoracic surgery. Exclusion Criteria: * Known allergy to local anesthetics; * Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease; * Coagulation disorders or untreated hypovolemia; * Infection at the puncture site; * Spinal or chest wall deformity or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level. * Patients were withdrawn from the study if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative complications occurred such as massive bleeding (\>20 mL/kg), or if conversion to median sternotomy was required during surgery. * Patient's parents who do not consent to participate in the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chest wall tumor are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Anesthesiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital
Hanoi, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two nerve blocks go head to head for chest surgery pain
- Can a Nurse's confidence ease a Patient's postoperative pain?
- Antidepressant may double as pain reliever after gallbladder surgery
- Nerve blocks put to the test for breast surgery pain
- A Non-Opioid pain drug takes aim at Surgery's opioid problem
- Can a nerve block stop pain months after hysterectomy?