Skip the gauze? study tests No-Packing approach for abscess recovery
NCT ID NCT07280962
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two ways of treating a perianal abscess after draining it: packing the wound with gauze or leaving it open. The goal was to see which approach causes less pain and leads to faster recovery. Forty-four adults with a first-time abscess took part, and researchers measured pain, hospital stay length, and whether the abscess came back within a month.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical gauze packing
- What this could lead to
- If no packing works as well, patients could experience less pain and shorter hospital stays after abscess drainage.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 44 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. There is a chance that skipping packing could increase recurrence risk.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
44 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2025
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients presenting in the emergency department diagnosed with acute perianal abscess (Diagnosed on the basis of history and clinical examination with ultrasonographic evidence of quantifiable collection and confirmed by needle aspiration of pus from swelling) based on history and examination, requiring incision and drainage. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with prior perianal fistulas based on history and examination * Patients with recurrent abscess (based on history) * Horseshoe abscess as based on examination * Previous pelvic irradiation (based on history) * Immunocompromised patients * Malignant abscess
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Perianal abccess are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
King Edward Medical University
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan