New rinse may ease root canal pain better than standard
NCT ID NCT07173725
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether a rinse called octenidine reduces pain after root canal treatment better than the standard rinse chlorhexidine. 142 adults with a single-rooted tooth and asymptomatic apical periodontitis received one of the two rinses during their procedure. Pain was recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment. The goal was to see if octenidine leads to less early pain.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Octenidine dihydrochloride 0.1% solution
- What this could lead to
- If octenidine works better, it could offer a new option to reduce pain after root canal treatment.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial comparing two rinses, not a new treatment. Results may not apply to all teeth or pain types.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
142 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2023
- Finished
-
Jul 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive) * Single-rooted, single-canal tooth * Diagnosis of asymptomatic apical periodontitis on periapical radiographs * Able and willing to provide written informed consent * Able to complete a 48-hour pain diary (6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h) Exclusion Criteria: * Symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess * Previous root canal treatment of the study tooth * Systemic condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis or that interferes with pain assessment * Pregnancy or lactation * Known allergy or contraindication to study irrigants/materials * Use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs within 12 hours before treatment * Inability to comply with study procedures * More than one eligible tooth (one patient = one tooth rule; a pre-specified index tooth is selected)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Apical periodontitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bezmialem Vakif University Dental Hospital - Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two nerve blocks go head to head for chest surgery pain
- Can a Nurse's confidence ease a Patient's postoperative pain?
- Antidepressant may double as pain reliever after gallbladder surgery
- Nerve blocks put to the test for breast surgery pain
- A Non-Opioid pain drug takes aim at Surgery's opioid problem
- Can a nerve block stop pain months after hysterectomy?