Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Less invasive needle treatment could rival surgery for liver tumors

NCT ID NCT05129787

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two treatments for colorectal cancer that has spread to the liver: surgical removal of tumors versus a less invasive needle ablation procedure guided by 3D imaging. 230 patients are randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. The goal is to see if ablation works as well as surgery in controlling tumor growth and improving survival.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Thermal ablation (needle ablation with 3D verification) and surgical resection
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that needle ablation is as effective as surgery for treating liver metastases, offering a less invasive option with faster recovery.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 230 participants, and results may not apply to all patients. Ablation may have higher local recurrence rates than surgery.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 230 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Dec 2021

Expected to finish

Oct 2030

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically verified colorectal cancer * Colorectal liver metastases (proven or suspected) eligible for radical treatment using EITHER resection OR ablation (not a combination), as decided by the liver MDT meeting at the study center * The patient is fit to undergo both resection and ablation of all liver metastases * Size of largest lesion up to and including 30 mm * In case of solitary metastasis, resection plan includes resection of ≤ 2 anatomical segments. * In case of multiple metastases in one continuous resection, resection plan can include ≤ 4 anatomical segments (including hemihepatectomy) * ≤ 5 tumors to be treated in one procedure * Primary tumor either resected (primary first) or with a plan for curative treatment (liver first). Exclusion Criteria: • More than 3 lung metastases where 1 is \>10mm, or 1 lung metastasis \>15 mm (OR: unresectable lung metastases as decided by the lung MDT meeting) * Presence of extrahepatic, extrapulmonary metastases. * Surgical indication for removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the hepatic hilum. (Enlarged lymph nodes without indication of removal are not considered an exclusion criterium) * Tumor closer than 10 mm to right/left main bile duct * Suspected tumor infiltration to adjacent organs * Progression (as of RECIST \[18\]) on 2nd line chemotherapy * Previous inclusion in this trial * Not eligible for workup according to study criteria * Contraindication to contrast enhanced CT scan * Manifest liver cirrhosis * Pregnancy * ECOG performance status ≥3 * Simultaneous resection of primary tumor or any other concomitant surgical procedure * Any other reason why, in the investigator's opinion, the patient should not be included.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Colorectal cancer metastatic are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Oslo University Hospital, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, The National Hospital

    Oslo, 0424, Norway

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.