High-tech goggles vs. sound waves: which marks broken ribs better?
NCT ID NCT07243808
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 20, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two methods—mixed reality goggles and ultrasound—to help surgeons mark exactly where ribs are broken before surgery. About 30 adults with three or more broken ribs will take part. The goal is to see which method is more accurate and faster.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Hospitalized adults 18-80 years with CT-confirmed ≥3 rib fractures who meet indications for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) at participating thoracic surgery services. Participants are managed under routine care and, as part of preoperative planning, receive both mixed reality (MR) and ultrasound surface marking to enable within-subject accuracy comparisons. Enrollment is prospective (non-probability sampling). Key exclusions include uncorrected coagulopathy, known osteoporosis or pathologic fractures, and respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability requiring emergent surgery.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Ages 18 to 80 years 2. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrates ≥3 rib fractures, and the patient meets indications for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). 3. Able to understand the study and provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Uncorrected coagulopathy. 2. Known osteoporosis or pathologic fractures. 3. Respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability requiring emergent surgery. 4. Declines to participate or withdraws consent.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Rib fractures are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two drugs, one nerve block: which keeps rib fracture pain away longer?
- Fixing broken ribs with surgery may cut pain better than drugs alone
- Can a simple patch replace opioids for broken ribs in seniors?
- Ultrasound-Guided epidurals: a missed opportunity?
- Pain relief showdown for broken ribs: IV lidocaine vs nerve block
- Rib fracture surgery: does age matter more than injury severity?