Flap or graft? new study aims to settle debate on best reconstruction after melanoma surgery
NCT ID NCT07354152
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques—perforator flap versus skin graft—for repairing the wound left after removing a stage II melanoma. Researchers want to see which method leads to faster wound healing and better quality of life. Forty adults with melanoma on the trunk, abdomen, or limbs will take part. The goal is to find the best way to heal without compromising cancer control.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- perforator flap reconstruction
- What this could lead to
- If this works, it could show that flap reconstruction heals faster and improves quality of life after melanoma removal, without hiding cancer recurrence.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 40 people, so results may not apply to everyone. Flaps might still delay spotting a recurrence, though no evidence supports that yet.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 40 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2026
- Expected to finish
-
May 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients treated for cutaneous melanoma
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult men or women (≥ 18 years) * Patients with cutaneous melanoma of any stage (I, II, or III) according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (2017), diagnosed prior to surgery * Non-closable surgical defect after margin re-excision Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with microscopic or macroscopic nodal involvement when the sentinel lymph node has been removed * Patients with distant metastases identified on ultrasound and/or CT scan and/or PET-CT, when performed * Surgical contraindication to perforator flap reconstruction * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients without health insurance coverage * Vulnerable individuals: persons deprived of liberty, under legal guardianship, or under curatorship
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Stage II cutaneous melanoma are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU Nantes-Department of Severe Burns and Aesthetic Surgery
RECRUITINGNantes, Nantes, 44000, France