Sleep apnea device showdown: which mouthpiece wins?
NCT ID NCT06970171
First seen May 22, 2026 · Last updated May 22, 2026
Summary
This study compares two different mouthpieces (mandibular advancement devices) for people with obstructive sleep apnea who cannot use a CPAP machine. The goal is to see which device is more comfortable, has fewer side effects like jaw pain, and is easier to stick with over a year. Twenty-eight adults will be randomly assigned to one of the two devices and followed for 12 months.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME (OSAS) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Endodontology
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.