Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can immune antibodies fight toxic shock in kids? small trial hopes to find out

NCT ID NCT02219165

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested whether giving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to children with toxic shock syndrome is practical and might help. Toxic shock is a rare but life-threatening reaction to bacterial toxins. The trial enrolled 30 children in intensive care, giving them either IVIG or a placebo (albumin) within 12 hours of shock. The main goal was to see if such a study could be done smoothly, not to prove IVIG works. Researchers also tracked organ failure and side effects to guide a future larger trial.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)
What this could lead to
If this pilot shows IVIG is feasible and reduces organ failure, it could lead to a larger trial testing whether IVIG can save more children from toxic shock.
What could go wrong
This is a small pilot study (30 children) focused on feasibility, not on proving that IVIG works. The treatment is expensive and not yet approved for toxic shock, so results may not lead to a proven therapy.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 2

Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.

Participants

30 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2015

Finished

Apr 2019

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

1 month to 17 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * 1 month \<Age \< 18 years * Admitted to PICU, with a strong suspicion of staphylococcal or streptococcal infection (at least one of the following criteria): * Diagnostic of TSS according to CDC (Centre for Disease Control) criteria or Group A streptococcus necrotizing fasciitis (positive streptest) or Varicella with infected lesions and erythroderma or positive streptest or Erythroderma in menstrual period or Pleuropneumopathy with erythroderma or positive streptest in pleural fluid or Erythroderma and biological fluid positive to type A streptococcus ou staphylococcus (articular, pericardial, bronchopulmonar, pharynx…) * with shock resistant to fluid resuscitation defined as the presence, despite 40 ml/kg of fluid volume in 1 hour, of: hypotension (\<5th percentile) or systolic arterial pressure \< 2 SD for age or need for vasoactive drugs in order to maintain AP at a normal level (dopamine \> 5µg/kg/min or dobutamine, adrenaline, noradrenaline, milrinone whatever the dose) or 2 signs of hypo perfusion among: metabolic acidosis with a base deficit \> 5 lactate x 2 laboratory normal value diuresis \< 0,5 ml/kg/h capillary refill time \> 5 sec difference skin/central temperature \> 3°C * Consent to participation Exclusion Criteria: * First signs of shock appeared more than 24h ago * Known hypersensitivity to one of the components (study treatment or placebo) * Hypersensitivity to homologous immunoglobulins, specifically in very rare cases of Ig A deficit, when the patient has anti-IgA antibodies * Known hyperprolinemia * Immunodeficiency (acquired or not) * Immunosuppressive drugs * No health cover

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Necrotizing fasciitis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant

    Bron, 69677, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.