Which IVF stimulation is easier on patients? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT06175832
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two different ovarian stimulation methods used in IVF to see which one patients prefer and tolerate better. Sixty women undergoing either fertility preservation or preimplantation genetic testing will try both methods in a crossover design. The main goal is to measure treatment-related quality of life and satisfaction through questionnaires.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Corifollitropin alfa (Elonva), recombinant FSH (Puregon), GnRH antagonist (Orgalutran), GnRH agonist (Gonapeptyl), progestin (Cerazette)
- What this could lead to
- If this trial succeeds, it could help identify which ovarian stimulation method is more comfortable and convenient for patients undergoing IVF or fertility preservation.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center phase 4 study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The focus is on patient satisfaction, not pregnancy or live birth rates.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 60 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Prescreening: Clarification: Pre-screening might be performed to identify women with AFC \> 5 and AMH \> 1.1 ng/ml (Bologna criteria, AFC and AMH values are valid for one year). Inclusion criteria for: * Group 1: indication for oocyte cryopreservation * Group 2: indication for IVF/ICSI and PGT-A Inclusion criteria for both groups: * First ovarian stimulation cycle * Aged ≥ 18 and \< 41 years old at the time of first OPU Exclusion Criteria: * contra-indication for ovarian stimulation * expected poor ovarian response (Bologna Criteria) * PCOS patients * refusal to fill out questionnaires before, during and after treatment * simultaneous participation in another clinical study * untreated and uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction; * current use of oral contraceptives, anti-psychotics, anti-epileptics or chemotherapy; * pregnant or breastfeeding women. A woman is considered of childbearing potential (WOCBP), i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Fertility preservation are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Hospital Ghent
RECRUITINGGhent, 9000, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Heart Disease's hidden toll: study tracks quality of life across mind, body, and spirit
- 150,000 children to be tracked from birth to old age in massive health study
- Can a website help liver cancer patients care for themselves during chemoembolization?
- A 10-Question survey could give brazilian pulmonary hypertension patients a voice in their care
- Fewer dialysis sessions: can Twice-Weekly work as well?
- Two ways to rebuild a tongue: which one leaves patients better off?