New invisalign expander vs traditional device: which works better for Kids' jaw problems?
NCT ID NCT07485478
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares the Invisalign Palatal Expander (IPE) with the Rapid Palatal Expander (RPE) in children aged 8–12 who have a narrow upper jaw and an underbite (skeletal Class III). Participants will wear a facemask after expansion. Researchers use 3D X-rays to measure changes in jaw bones and tooth position, and also interview children and parents about their experience. The goal is to see which device works better and is more comfortable.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 24 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Mar 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
8 to 12 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged between 8 and 12 years * Patients in the mixed dentition or early permanent stage have at least three stable teeth per quadrant, good oral hygiene, and healthy periodontal tissues * Patients with maxilla-mandibular discrepancies; skeletal class III is indicated by an ANB angle \< 0 degrees or a Wits appraisal value that is negative, and Maxillary constriction is characterized by posterior crossbite teeth or having a maxillary width below the norm value. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with craniofacial anomalies such as cleft lip and palate * Patient with a prior history of maxillary expansion. * Patients who have systemic conditions that contraindicate orthodontic treatment.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Skeletal class III malocclusion are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new appliance rival the face mask for jaw correction?
- A new device may fix underbites without the facemask
- The genetic clues behind underbites: a new study digs deep
- Can a tweaked jaw surgery cut nerve damage risk?
- Clear aligner aims to guide jaw growth and fix underbite without metal braces
- Orthodontic treatment may trigger cellular stress responses in children