New study aims to find best pain block for hip surgery patients
NCT ID NCT07180979
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two types of nerve blocks (PENG block vs. a combination of lumbar and sacral ESPB) to see which provides better pain control after total hip replacement. Ninety adults aged 65 and older will be randomly assigned to receive one of the blocks during surgery. Researchers will measure opioid use, pain scores, and how quickly patients can walk in the first 48 hours after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Ropivacaine
- What this could lead to
- If one nerve block proves better, it could mean less pain, less opioid use, and faster walking after hip replacement surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase trial (90 people) comparing two established techniques. The difference may be small or not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 90 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
65 to 100 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 65 years * ASA physical status I-III * Elective unilateral THA via posterior or lateral approach * Informed consent provided Exclusion Criteria: * Allergy to study drugs (ropivacaine, dexamethasone) * Chronic opioid use (\>30 MME/day) * Coagulopathy or infection at the injection site * BMI \> 40 kg/m² * Pre-existing motor weakness or neuropathy in the affected limb * Cognitive impairment precluding informed consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hip arthropathy are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
RECRUITINGPoznan, 62-701, Poland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Brain waves may reveal how well a sedative blocks surgical pain
- Hip replacement showdown: does the labrum stay or go?
- Can physical therapy beamed into rural homes ease arthritis pain?
- Physical therapy may unlock lasting activity for older adults with joint pain
- Can catching anemia months before joint surgery speed recovery?
- Can a simple grip test predict joint replacement recovery?