Please sign in to follow a disease.
Shock waves vs nerve zaps: which eases heel pain best?
NCT ID NCT06558552
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two noninvasive treatments for chronic heel pain caused by heel spurs: extracorporeal shock wave therapy and a newer nerve stimulation method called transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency. 100 adults aged 18-65 with heel spurs took part. The goal was to see which treatment better reduces pain and improves foot function.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency and extracorporeal shock wave therapy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward a noninvasive, drug-free option for easing chronic heel pain from heel spurs.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with no phase designation, so results may not apply broadly. Both treatments are noninvasive but may not work for everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
100 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Finished
-
Apr 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18-65, * Patients diagnosed with calcaneus spur and epin calcaneus in radiological imaging with anamnesis, clinical and physical examination * Patients who signed the voluntary consent form Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have undergone interventional procedures for heel spurs in the last 6 months, * Morbidly obese patients (BMI\>35 kg/m2), * Patients with advanced decompensated heart failure and pacemakers, * Patients with known transcutaneous pad allergy, patients with skin infection in the area where ESWT was performed or pads were attached, * Patients with metal implants, * Patients with circulatory disorders and lesions, * Patients who cannot communicate and cannot be positioned, * Patients with bleeding disorders, patients with severe psychosis and progressive neurological deficits and muscle diseases, * and pregnant women.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Heel spur are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Muscle therapy may restore strength in dialysis patients
- Your DNA may hold the key to personalized pain relief
- Which injection eases knee pain better: steroid or sugar?
- Can we predict chronic pain after breast cancer surgery?
- Teaching doctors to talk about pain: a new approach to safer opioid prescribing
- Can a silent word ease both PTSD and chronic pain? a VA trial puts mantram repetition to the test