Camera showdown: which machine best sees heart failure damage?
NCT ID NCT02515812
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two types of cameras—a newer CZT camera and a standard Anger camera—to see how well they measure heart nerve function in people with heart failure. Forty-five patients received a special tracer injection (I-123-MIBG) and were scanned with both cameras. The goal was to validate whether the newer camera gives equally reliable results, which could help doctors better assess heart failure severity.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- I-123-MIBG
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the best camera for evaluating heart failure patients, potentially improving risk assessment.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed imaging comparison study, not a treatment trial. It does not test any new therapy or directly improve patient outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
45 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Oct 2012
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age above 18 years (except major patients under guardianship) * patient who signed the consent form * written and spoken French * Beneficiaries of the social security system * Stable heart failure with LV dysfunction (\<45%) of ischemic or nonischemic origin Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a recent history (\<21 days) acute coronary failure (myocardial infarction, unstable angina) * Patients with severe extra-cardiac disease may interfere with treatment decisions (cancer, severe hepatic or renal impairment) * Major patients under guardianship * Pregnant or lactating women * Women in age and condition of childbearing * Patients unable to understand the purpose of the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Heart failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Médecine Nucléaire -CHU de Caen
Caen, 14000, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which SGLT2 inhibitor wins? trial pits empagliflozin against dapagliflozin
- Can daily mindful breathing ease heart failure symptoms?
- Can a smartphone app keep heart failure patients out of the hospital?
- Can better training get doctors to talk about what matters most to dying veterans?
- Can AI read heart ultrasounds as well as trained sonographers?
- Can modern heart failure drugs reverse damage in three months?