3D scans reveal which gum graft works best for receding gums
NCT ID NCT07409558
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares a standard gum graft technique with a modified version to treat gum recession on lower front teeth. About 34 healthy, non-smoking adults will receive one of the two procedures. Researchers will use 3D scans to measure tissue thickness and volume changes over 6 months, aiming to see which method provides better stability and gum coverage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 34 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 years or older * Systemically healthy individuals * Non-smokers * Presence of localized Cairo Class II gingival recession with a vertical recession depth of ≥3 mm on the buccal surfaces of mandibular incisors * Probing pocket depth of ≤3 mm at the tooth/teeth to be treated * No tooth mobility (mobility grade ≤1) * Absence of cervical composite restorations or non-carious cervical lesions * Presence of a shallow vestibule (\<5 mm) Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy or lactation * Untreated periodontal disease * Presence of parafunctional habits * Poor oral hygiene, defined as a full-mouth plaque score \>20% * Malpositioned, rotated, or crowded teeth in the buccal position * Known systemic diseases (e.g., acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, diabetes mellitus) * Any condition or medication that may affect gingival wound healing * ASA physical status classification III or higher
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gingival recession, localized are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University
RECRUITINGKahramanmaraş, Kahramanmaraş, 46000, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple gel speed up gum graft recovery?
- Gum graft showdown: which technique blends best?
- Sticky bone may boost gum graft success for receding gums
- Microneedling boosts gum surgery results in thin gums, small study finds
- Gum grafts could spare you a new bridge
- Diabetes slows mouth healing? new study investigates