3D scans reveal which gum graft works best for receding gums
NCT ID NCT07409558
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares a standard gum graft technique with a modified version to treat gum recession on lower front teeth. About 34 healthy, non-smoking adults will receive one of the two procedures. Researchers will use 3D scans to measure tissue thickness and volume changes over 6 months, aiming to see which method provides better stability and gum coverage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION, LOCALIZED are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University
RECRUITINGKahramanmaraş, Kahramanmaraş, 46000, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple gel speed up gum graft recovery?
- Gum graft showdown: which technique blends best?
- Sticky bone may boost gum graft success for receding gums
- Microneedling boosts gum surgery results in thin gums, small study finds
- Gum grafts could spare you a new bridge
- Diabetes slows mouth healing? new study investigates