Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Cutting vs. No-Cut: which dental implant method heals better?

NCT ID NCT07654452

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Suez Canal University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two ways to place dental implants in the upper front teeth area: one that involves cutting and lifting the gum (flap technique) and one that does not (flapless technique). Sixteen adults who have been missing a tooth in that area for over a year will receive an implant using one of these methods. Researchers will measure pain, swelling, implant stability, and bone changes over six months to see which approach leads to better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could guide dentists toward a less painful or more stable implant procedure for missing front teeth.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Individual healing and bone quality vary widely.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

20 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2025

Finished

May 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

30 to 50 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged from 30 to 50 years old. * Adults of both genders. * Patients who are free from any systemic disease (ASA I). * Patients with teeth loss at upper anterior and premolar regions more than 1-year. * Presence of sufficient apical and peripheral bone to achieve primary implant stability (minimum 3-5 mm of bone beyond the socket apex and overall socket length ≥ 10 mm). * Patients with bone quality classified as D3, as assessed by pre-operative CBCT. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant and lactating women. * Heavy smoking (\>10 cigarettes/day) * Patients with bad oral habits such as bruxism. * Patients with poor oral hygiene. * Patients with gingival diseases. * Patients with periodontal diseases (with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss). * Teeth with periapical or lateral infection or lesions.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implant are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Tooth Loss

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Dental implant Maxillary tooth loss Partial edentulism Tooth loss

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Suez Canal University, Faculty of Dentistry

    Ismailia, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.