Which lung biopsy method is safer and more accurate?
NCT ID NCT07761351
First seen Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two established biopsy methods for small lung nodules (≤2 cm): CT-guided percutaneous biopsy and shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT. The goal is to see which approach is more effective at diagnosing cancer and which has fewer complications, such as pneumothorax (collapsed lung). Adults with a lung nodule needing biopsy may participate. The study will measure diagnostic accuracy and safety to help guide future clinical decisions.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Two biopsy procedures: shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT) and CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the best biopsy method for small lung nodules, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing complications like collapsed lungs.
- What could go wrong
- The trial is in phase 4 and involves 550 participants, but results may not apply to all patients or nodules. Both procedures carry risks, including bleeding or pneumothorax (collapsed lung).
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 550 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Apr 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is aged 18 years or older at time of consent. 2. Diagnostic nodule biopsy(s) indicated per multidisciplinary team (or equivalent). 3. Target pulmonary nodule ≤2 cm in largest diameter. 4. Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent for clinical study participation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient has previously undergone a biopsy procedure of the target nodule by any approach. 2. Patient was previously randomized in this study but did not undergo biopsy. 3. Patient is participating in an interventional research study or research study with investigational agents with an unknown safety profile that would interfere with participation in this study or study results. 4. Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding as determined by standard site practices. 5. Patient lacks the capacity to provide informed consent for themselves, or is a vulnerable patient whose ability to protect their own interests or to consent freely may be diminished, including but not limited to, patients who may be unduly influenced through dependency on the sponsor, the hospital, or the study doctor. 6. Patient is not willing to comply with study participation requirements.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lung cancer (diagnosis) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
2 sites in 2 countries. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Basel University Hospital
RECRUITINGBasel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland
-
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation
RECRUITINGLondon, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Breath-Tracking sensor aims to sharpen lung cancer scans
- Can AI tailor recovery instructions after lung cancer surgery?
- Can a new radiation machine cut breath holds for cancer patients?
- Software aims to steer bronchoscopes more precisely in lung cancer checks
- Gentle exercise may revive energy in lung cancer patients
- Laser and AI join forces to spot aggressive lung cancer