Can a High-Tech numbing method ease Kids' dental fear?
NCT ID NCT07748390
First seen Aug 05, 2026 · Last updated Aug 06, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at how different numbing techniques affect dental anxiety and pain in children aged 8-10 who need a specific tooth treatment (vital pulp therapy) on their permanent back teeth. It compares the standard numbing injection with two computer-controlled delivery systems that are already used in clinics. The choice of technique is made by the dentist as usual, and the study simply observes and measures the children's pain, anxiety, and any complications using standard scales. The goal is to gather evidence that could help dentists pick the best numbing method to make dental visits less stressful for kids.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Different local anesthesia techniques: conventional inferior alveolar nerve block and two computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the best anesthesia method to reduce pain and anxiety in children during dental procedures, improving their experience and care.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, so it cannot prove cause and effect. Results may vary based on individual children and clinician skill, and the findings might not apply to all dental situations.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 120 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study population will consist of children aged 8-10 years who require vital pulp therapy of permanent mandibular first molars and attend the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Dentistry. Eligible participants will be systemically healthy children with appropriate cognitive and communication abilities and acceptable cooperation levels according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (scores 3 or 4). Participants will be evaluated according to the routine clinical care provided, and the effects of different local anesthesia techniques on dental anxiety, pain response, physiological parameters, and postoperative outcomes will be assessed.
- Ages
-
8 to 10 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 8-10 years. * Children and parents/legal guardians who agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent. * Patients requiring vital pulp therapy of a permanent mandibular first molar. * Patients classified as Frankl Behavior Rating Scale score 3 or 4. Systemically healthy children (ASA I). * Children with adequate cognitive and communication abilities to understand the study procedures and pain/anxiety assessment scales. * Permanent mandibular first molars without clinical or radiographic signs of abscess, fistula, or periapical pathology. Exclusion Criteria: * Children with systemic diseases or medical conditions affecting dental treatment. * Children classified as Frankl Behavior Rating Scale score 1 or 2. * Patients with known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetic agents (e.g., lidocaine, articaine). * Teeth with acute dental infection signs, including abscess, cellulitis, or extensive infection. * Teeth showing clinical or radiographic evidence of periapical pathology. * Children unable to understand or complete pain and anxiety assessment scales due to cognitive, visual, hearing, or communication limitations. * Patients who do not comply with the study procedures or withdraw consent.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Newer sedative faces off against propofol in heart patients
- Could a whiff of xenon replace the Pre-Surgery chill pill?
- Can a vibrating dolphin toy calm kids during blood draws?
- Can a gentler anesthesia cocktail protect a child's developing brain?
- Which monitor reads a Child's pain best during surgery?
- Could a simple ear test replace CT scans before pediatric ear surgery?