Freezing nerves vs. epidural: which eases post-surgery pain better?
NCT ID NCT07431632
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ways to manage pain after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair: freezing the intercostal nerves (cryoanalgesia) versus an epidural block. About 40 participants aged 13 and older will be randomly assigned to one method. The goal is to see which approach leads to a shorter hospital stay, less opioid use, and better pain control.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 40 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
13 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Having pectus excavatum; 2. Having signed the Informed Consent Form for the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \< 13 years at the time of the procedure; 2. Chronic use of analgesics preoperatively; 3. Pectus carinatum, Poland syndrome, or other chest wall anomalies; 4. Previous pectus excavatum repair by any technique; 5. Previous thoracic surgery; 6. Congenital heart disease; 7. Hemorrhagic dyscrasia; 8. Major anesthetic risk factors or history of previous problems with anesthesia; 9. Pregnancy.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Funnel chest are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Thoracic Surgery Division, Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School
RECRUITINGSão Paulo, São Paulo, 05403904, Brazil
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two nerve blocks go head to head for chest surgery pain
- Can a Nurse's confidence ease a Patient's postoperative pain?
- Antidepressant may double as pain reliever after gallbladder surgery
- Nerve blocks put to the test for breast surgery pain
- A Non-Opioid pain drug takes aim at Surgery's opioid problem
- Can a nerve block stop pain months after hysterectomy?