Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can cooled radiofrequency beat traditional heat for back pain?

NCT ID NCT07749599

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 06, 2026 · Last updated Sep 04, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This trial compares two minimally invasive procedures—traditional bipolar radiofrequency and cooled radiofrequency—for treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain, a common cause of lower back pain. Adults aged 18-70 with persistent SI joint pain that hasn't improved with conservative care may participate. The study measures pain intensity and functional disability to see if one technique offers better or longer-lasting relief.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Cooled radiofrequency and traditional bipolar radiofrequency procedures
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that cooled radiofrequency provides longer-lasting pain relief and better function for people with sacroiliac joint pain, potentially becoming a preferred treatment option.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small trial, and results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry risks like infection, bleeding, or nerve damage, and pain relief may not be permanent.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 70 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Oct 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Apr 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 70 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18-70 years * Chronic sacroiliac joint pain for ≥ 3 months * Pain intensity ≥ 5 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) * Positive SI joint provocative tests (at least 3 out of 5) * ≥ 50% pain relief following diagnostic SI joint block * Failure of conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks Exclusion Criteria: * Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy not appropriately managed * Local or systemic infection * Pregnancy * Severe psychiatric illness * Previous radiofrequency ablation of the SI joint * Spinal pathology explaining pain other than SI joint dysfunction

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sacroiliac joint pain are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Assuit university hospitals

    Asyut, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.