Can cooled radiofrequency beat traditional heat for back pain?

NCT ID NCT07749599

Not yet recruiting Symptom relief Sponsor: Assiut University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Aug 06, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two minimally invasive procedures—traditional bipolar radiofrequency and cooled radiofrequency—for treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain, a common cause of lower back pain. Adults aged 18-70 with persistent SI joint pain that hasn't improved with conservative care may participate. The study measures pain intensity and functional disability to see if one technique offers better or longer-lasting relief.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Cooled radiofrequency and traditional bipolar radiofrequency procedures
What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that cooled radiofrequency provides longer-lasting pain relief and better function for people with sacroiliac joint pain, potentially becoming a preferred treatment option.
What could go wrong: This is a relatively small trial, and results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry risks like infection, bleeding, or nerve damage, and pain relief may not be permanent.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SACROILIAC JOINT PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SACROILIAC JOINT PAIN

Contacts and locations

Locations

Assuit university hospitals

Asyut, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.