Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a simple pill replace IV drips for bleeding ulcers?

NCT ID NCT05582174

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares an oral medication called Vonoprazan to the standard high-dose IV proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for preventing rebleeding in people with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic treatment. About 594 adults will be randomly assigned to receive either oral Vonoprazan or IV esomeprazole for 72 hours, followed by oral medication for a month. The goal is to see if the oral option works just as well as the IV treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Vonoprazan (oral) and esomeprazole (IV and oral)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a simpler, oral-only treatment option to prevent rebleeding after endoscopic treatment for bleeding ulcers, potentially reducing hospital stays.
What could go wrong
This is a phase 4 trial, so the drugs are already approved, but it is still testing a new use. The main risk is that Vonoprazan may not be as effective as the standard IV PPI, leading to more rebleeding episodes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

About 594 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

May 2023

Expected to finish

Jul 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * \- Patients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for sign and symptoms of aneamia or upper GI bleeding including haematochezia, melaena or haematemesis, and found to a non-variceal upper GI cause of bleeding (peptic ulcers, dieulafoy's lesions, Mallory Weiss tear with active bleeding or major stigmata of haemorrhage * Major stigmata of recent haemorrhage includes peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) ,with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) or an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb). For peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb), the clot would be lifted (by irrigation using syringe boluses or water pump device, or manipulation with a snare or alligator etc.) and ulcer base examined to look for underlying vessels. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessel should receive endoscopic haemostasis * Patients who had undergone endoscopic hemostatic treatment (a combination of hemoclipping therapy or contact thermocoagulation using multipolar/bipolar electrocautery probes or haemostatic forceps, with or without preinjection of diluted epinephrine. Endoscopic haemostasis is defined as no evidence of bleeding after irrigation and 3 minutes of observation Exclusion Criteria: * No consent * Patients under the age of 18 * Patients who were pregnant or in lactation * Hypersensitivity to PPI or Vonoprazan or any component of the formulation * Patients who were found to have tumour bleeding, oesophageal varices as the cause of the NVGIB * NVGIB due to post therapeutic endoscopic treatment such as gastric polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection etc.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bleeding peptic ulcers are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage peptic ulcer disease

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    8 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University

    RECRUITING

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

  • Shenzhen Pingshan District People's Hospital

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

  • Yangjiang People's Hospital of Guangdong Medical University

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Yangjiang, Guangdong, China

  • Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University)

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Zhuhai, Guangdong, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.