Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which scope causes less stress? video vs. conventional laryngoscope compared

NCT ID NCT07300878

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 208 adults having planned surgery under general anesthesia. It compared two devices used to place a breathing tube: a video laryngoscope and a conventional laryngoscope. The goal was to see which one causes a smaller rise in heart rate and blood pressure during the procedure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

208 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Dec 2025

Finished

May 2026

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

16 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Elective surgeries under General Endotracheal Anesthesia. ASA class I and II. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy * Body mass index \>35 kg/m2 * No teeth * Maxillofacial trauma * Limited Cervical spine movement * Upper Airway Tumors * Preoperative assessment indicating difficult airway requiring use of video laryngoscope or fiberoptic intubation.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Conventional laryngoscopy are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Conventional laryngoscopy Laryngoscopic stress response Video laryngoscopy

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Deparment of Anesthesia PIMS

    Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.