Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

New study tests which breathing tube tool works best for C-Sections

NCT ID NCT07667010

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study aims to see if it's possible to run a larger trial comparing two types of video laryngoscope blades used to help with breathing during cesarean sections under general anesthesia. The blades differ in their curve: one has a gentle curve (Macintosh-style) and the other has a more pronounced curve (hyperangulated). Researchers will enroll 100 pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent C-sections to test recruitment, adherence, and data completeness.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could pave the way for a larger trial that determines which blade type is safer or more effective for intubation during cesarean sections.
What could go wrong
This is a small feasibility study, not designed to prove which blade is better. It may not recruit enough participants or show clear differences between the blades.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 100 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jun 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1\. Pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. No tracheal intubation performed and (ii) patient refusal of consent. 2. Patients not receiving general anesthesia. 3. Patients that previously participated in the study.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Airway anesthesia are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

obstetric disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Airway anesthesia Cesarean birth General anesthesia General anesthesia; tracheal intubation Intubation Obstetric Obstetric anesthesia Obstetric anesthesia problems Video laryngoscopy

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.