Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which works better for bladder leaks: e-consult or nurse co-management?

NCT ID NCT06040645

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of California, San Diego Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only This study
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two methods of delivering care for urinary incontinence in primary care settings. In one arm, primary care doctors get electronic specialist advice (e-consult). In the other, a nurse practitioner (APP) provides education and self-management coaching via telemedicine. The trial enrolls 1200 women and measures how well doctors follow evidence-based guidelines and how patients' symptoms improve.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show which care model works better for treating urinary incontinence in primary care, leading to improved patient outcomes and more efficient use of specialists.
What could go wrong
This is a comparative effectiveness study, not a test of a new drug or device. Results may not apply to all healthcare settings or patient populations.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 1,200 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Feb 2024

Expected to finish

Nov 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria of Primary Care Physicians: \- Primary care physician belonging to a recruited office among one of three participating sites: UCSD, UCLA, KUMC Inclusion Criteria of Patients: * Age \>18 y/o * English or Spanish fluency * Female * Answers \"yes\" to incontinence screening tool and agrees to participate Exclusion Criteria of Primary Care Physicians: * Non-primary care specialty * Does not belong to one of the participating offices Exclusion Criteria of Patients: * Age \<18 y/o * Answers \"no\" to incontinence screening tool and/or does not agree to participate * Primary care provider (who reviews a list of patients that screen positive) deems patient ineligible due to pregnant, severe memory impairment, or psychiatric history preventing participation

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Urinary incontinence are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Urinary Incontinence

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Urinary incontinence

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    3 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of California Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92093, United States

  • University of Kansas

    Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.