Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New study tests simpler procedure to stop post-miscarriage bleeding

NCT ID NCT07206342

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at the best way to stop heavy bleeding after a miscarriage. It compares two procedures: one that temporarily blocks blood vessels with a gelatin material, and another that does the same but also removes tissue from the womb. About 110 participants will be followed for a year to see which method works better and how it affects future fertility.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
resorbable gelatin embolization
What this could lead to
If successful, this could establish a simpler, less invasive standard treatment for post-miscarriage bleeding, potentially preserving fertility.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial (110 participants) comparing two procedures; one may not be clearly better, and results may not apply to all patients. Risks include bleeding recurrence or complications from the procedures.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 110 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jan 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient who experienced a miscarriage within 3 months * Patient with gynecological bleeding * Patient presenting with hypervascularized uterine retention with negative Doppler ultrasound findings (endometrial hypervascularization with 1) systolic peak velocity greater than 70 cm/s and/or 2) resistance index (RI) within the retention \< 0.5) * Patient affiliated to french social security * Patient who has signed the written informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * Patient presenting to the emergency department with hemorrhagic shock: systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg associated with tachycardia \> 120 bpm * Severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min) * Medical history of severe allergy to iodinated contrast media * Severe coagulation disorders (platelets \<50G/L, PT \< 50%) * Anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agent that cannot be discontinued a few days before the procedure * Patient referred to in Articles L1121-5, L1121-6, and L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code * Staff with a hierarchical relationship to the principal investigator * Patient in the exclusion period of another study * Patient cannot be contacted in an emergency * Participation in other interventional studies during the study period

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hemorrhage, obstetric are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Hemorrhage uterine anomalies Uterine Hemorrhage

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    4 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU Grenoble Alpes

    Grenoble, 38000, France

  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33000, France

  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand-Gabriel Montpied

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

  • CHU de St Etienne-Hôpital Nord

    Saint-Etienne, 42000, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.