Ear injury diagnosis showdown: which grading system wins?
NCT ID NCT04726306
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests how accurately doctors, nurses, and technicians can diagnose ear barotrauma (pressure injury to the ear) using two different grading systems: the TEED score and the O'Neill Grading System (OGS). Thirty healthcare providers will grade 120 photos of eardrums to see which system is more precise and consistent. The goal is to find a better tool for diagnosing and treating this condition.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to a more accurate and consistent way for doctors and nurses to diagnose ear barotrauma, improving treatment decisions.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early validation study with only 30 participants reviewing photos, not real patients. The results may not apply to all clinical settings or patient populations.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Sample of healthcare professionals invited to participate in grading of otic barotrauma.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Physicians 2. Hyperbaric Nurses 3. Nurse Practitioners 4. HyperbaricTechnicians 5. Physician Assistants Exclusion Criteria: 1-Refusal to participate upon invitation.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Barotitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Phelps Hospital Northwell Health
Sleepy Hollow, New York, 10591, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple nasal dilator quiet the ear symptoms of patulous eustachian tube?
- AI-Crafted care plan aims to stop a common ICU harm
- Can artificial intelligence stop bedsores before they start?
- A puff of air could unclog stuffy ears without surgery?
- A simpler air mattress may prevent bedsores just as well — trial puts it to the test
- Blood gas clues could predict bedsores in intensive care