Filler Face-Off: sculptra vs radiesse at the genetic level
NCT ID NCT05620043
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at how two different dermal fillers—Sculptra and Radiesse Plus—change gene activity in the skin. Researchers took small skin samples from 21 people after treatment to measure genes related to collagen, elastin, and skin repair. The goal was to understand which filler might better support skin health at a molecular level.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Poly-L-lactic acid (Sculptra) and calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse Plus)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose which filler is better for stimulating collagen and skin repair based on genetic markers.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small, early study (21 people) looking at gene changes, not actual cosmetic outcomes. Results may not predict real-world effectiveness or apply to everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
21 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2022
- Finished
-
Nov 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
22 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subject with a minimum of shallow nasolabial fold (NLF) contour deficiencies as assessed via the wrinkle assessment scale * Subject with identical WAS scores on both NLFs * Ability of giving consent for participation in the study * Agreement to have skin biopsies on NLFs Exclusion Criteria: * Significant NLF asymmetry, or different WAS score on each NLF * Pregnant, planning pregnancy during the course of the study or breastfeeding * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the treatment products * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to anesthetics or lidocaine
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gene expression are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Miami Dermatology & Laser Institute
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.