Which scan spots hidden tumors best? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT05255159
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares three different PET/CT scans (68Ga-HA-DOTATATE, 18F-DOPA, and 18F-FDG) in 50 people with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. The goal is to see if all tumors show up on the standard scan or if some are missed, which could change treatment. Participants will get all three scans, and results will be compared lesion by lesion.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE, 18F-DOPA, and 18F-FDG (radioactive tracers used in PET/CT scans)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors choose the best scan to detect all tumor spots, leading to more accurate staging and better treatment decisions for people with neuroendocrine tumors.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study (50 people) at one center. It compares scans but does not test a new treatment, so any impact on patient outcomes is uncertain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
50 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * History of biopsy proven neuroendocrine tumor including (but not limited to): gastrointestinal NET, pancreatic NET, pulmonary NET, NET unknown primary, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, medullary thyroid cancer, medulloblastoma, meningioma * At least two abnormal 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE positive lesions suspected to represent neuroendocrine tumor (at least tow lesions with SUVmax \> SUV meanliver). * Age greater or equal to 40 * Ability to provide written informed consent prior to participation in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Weight \> 225 kg (weight limitation of PET/CT scanner) * Inability to scan (ie. extreme claustrophobia) or inability to lie still for imaging * Any medical condition, serious inter-current illness, or other extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator or attending department physician, may significantly interfere with study performance or interpretation * Previous allergic reaction to 18F-DOPA * Lack of intravenous access * Pregnant * Breastfeeding * Less than 40 years old
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Starving brain tumors of blood before surgery
- Tiny DNA fragments in blood could reveal how aggressive a pancreatic tumor will be
- Swiss registry aims to map rare neuroendocrine tumors
- Can patients drop monthly injections after targeted radiotherapy for neuroendocrine tumors?
- Brain tumor or aneurysm first? study weighs the safer sequence
- Can a vast image library unlock better pancreatic diagnoses?