Dental implant study: which metal framework method wins?
NCT ID NCT07489027
First seen Apr 03, 2026 · Last updated Apr 29, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study looked at 27 people with full-arch dental implants to compare three ways of making the metal framework that supports the false teeth: traditional casting, computer-designed milling, and 3D printing. The goal was to see which method leads to fewer problems like screw loosening or breakage, and which gives the best fit. The findings help dentists choose the best technique for long-lasting implant-supported teeth.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTHESIS (INTERNAL) COMPLICATIONS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Mansoura University , Faculty Of Dentistry
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, P.O.Box:35516, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.