Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Dental implant showdown: which metal framework lasts longest?

NCT ID NCT07489027

First seen Apr 03, 2026 · Last updated Jun 23, 2026 · Updated 17 times

Summary

This study tested three methods for making the metal framework that supports full-arch dental implants: traditional casting, computer-aided milling, and 3D printing (SLM). Researchers tracked problems like screw loosening, tooth fractures, and framework fit in 27 patients. The goal was to see which technique leads to fewer complications and a better fit.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTHESIS (INTERNAL) COMPLICATIONS are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mansoura University , Faculty Of Dentistry

    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, P.O.Box:35516, Egypt

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Cobalt-Chromium framework fabrication techniques (conventional casting, CAD/CAM milling, selective laser melting)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves clearly better, it could reduce common dental implant problems like screw loosening or framework breakage, leading to more reliable full-arch restorations.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 27 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Differences between techniques might be small or not clinically meaningful.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.