Dental implant study compares 3 framework fabrication methods
NCT ID NCT07489027
First seen Apr 03, 2026 · Last updated Jun 15, 2026 · Updated 15 times
Summary
This study looked at 27 people who had full-arch dental implants in their upper and lower jaws. Researchers compared three different methods for making the metal framework that supports the false teeth: traditional casting, computer-aided milling, and 3D printing. They tracked how often problems like screw loosening or tooth breakage happened, and how well the framework fit.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTHESIS (INTERNAL) COMPLICATIONS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Mansoura University , Faculty Of Dentistry
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, P.O.Box:35516, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.