Which airway device wins? new study compares three tools for safer anesthesia
NCT ID NCT06383494
First seen Oct 01, 2025 · Last updated May 24, 2026 · Updated 30 times
Summary
This study tested three different breathing tube devices (GMA-Tulip, i-gel, and LMA-Supreme) in 498 adults having breast or lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. The goal was to see which device gives the best view of the airway and maintains safe breathing during surgery. Results help anesthesiologists choose the most effective tool for each patient.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANESTHESIA are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.