Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which ablation method best prevents stroke in atrial fibrillation?

NCT ID NCT06253000

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This study compares two common procedures—radiofrequency and cryoablation—for treating persistent atrial fibrillation, a heart rhythm disorder that raises stroke risk. Researchers will track 158 adults over 24 months to see which method better prevents strokes, transient ischemic attacks, and death. The goal is to identify the safest and most effective approach for long-term control.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation procedures
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors choose the best ablation method to reduce stroke and recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center study with 158 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both procedures carry risks like bleeding or heart damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 158 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jun 2023

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age over 18 years old; * Atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy; * Persistent and long-persisting form of atrial fibrillation; * The patient's consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Age under 18 and over 80 years old; * The presence of another cardiac pathology requiring surgical treatment; * Congenital heart defects; * Previous "open" cardiac surgery; * Bone marrow diseases; * Pathology of the blood coagulation system; * The left ventricular ejection fraction is less than 40%; * Moderate to severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min); * Drug-resistant hypertension (despite hypotensive therapy); * Organically altered mitral valve; * There are reasons to assume that the patient will not show up for subsequent visits (control points of the study) for various reasons; * The patient's participation in another clinical trial.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute cerebrovascular accident are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery

    RECRUITING

    Moscow, 121552, Russia

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.