Robot vs. doctor: can a machine outperform anesthesiologists in fluid management?
NCT ID NCT01950845
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether an automated closed-loop system could better manage fluid levels during major abdominal surgery compared to standard care by an anesthesiologist. Forty-six high-risk patients were randomly assigned to receive fluids via the automated system or manual control. The main goal was to see if the automated system improved cardiac output during surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Closed-loop automated fluid administration system (LIR®)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this system could help doctors give fluids more precisely during surgery, potentially improving recovery and reducing complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 46 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The system may not work better than standard care and could have technical issues.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
46 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Feb 2014
- Finished
-
Oct 2015
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Elective major abdominal surgery * Patient physical status ASA 2-4 * General anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation * High risk surgical patient with a per operative Vigileo® cardiac output monitoring decided a priori. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant female * Intraoperative hyperthermic chemotherapy procedure * Patient physical status ASA more than 4 * Patient with allergy to hydroxyethyl starch * Cardiac arrhythmia * ventilation with tidal volume inferior 7mL/Kg
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Colorectal surgery are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Pierre-Bénite, 69 495, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can watching kidney oxygen during liver surgery keep kidneys safe?
- Prostate drug tested to stop urinary problems after rectal surgery
- A Spleen-Saving surgery for pancreatic cancer faces its biggest test
- A new anesthesia drug may keep blood pressure steadier during liver surgery
- Can surgery pain be managed without opioids?
- A balloon tube that could spare patients a stoma after bowel surgery