Clear aligners vs. braces: which is better for crowded teeth?
NCT ID NCT07090746
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares clear aligners to traditional braces for treating mild to moderate dental crowding in adults with a normal jaw relationship. Twenty-four participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. The main goal is to see how each method affects the bone around the teeth and the height of that bone.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Clear aligner and fixed orthodontic appliance
- What this could lead to
- If clear aligners work as well as braces, patients may have a more comfortable and less visible option for fixing crowded teeth.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 24 people, so results may not apply to everyone. Both treatments can cause temporary discomfort or root shortening.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 24 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Dec 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 22 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Complete permanent dentition. * Angle Class I malocclusion cases with mild to moderate crowding (2-6 mm) that can be resolved by dental expansion and interproximal reduction (IPR). * Good oral hygiene. Exclusion Criteria: * Bad oral hygiene. * Previous orthodontic treatment. * Periodontal disease and previous periodontal surgery procedures. * Systemic diseases and/or craniofacial syndromes.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Skeletal class I non-extraction patients with dental crowding are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of dentistry mansoura university
Al Mansurah, Egypt