New hope for BRCA breast cancer: could cisplatin beat standard chemo?
NCT ID NCT01670500
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether cisplatin, a platinum-based chemo, works better than the standard doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) combo in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation. 118 participants received either cisplatin or AC before surgery. The main goal was to see which treatment led to a higher rate of complete tumor disappearance (pathologic complete response).
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide
- What this could lead to
- If cisplatin works better, it could offer a more effective chemotherapy option for women with BRCA-related breast cancer.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small Phase 2 trial, so results may not apply to all patients. Cisplatin also has side effects like kidney damage and nerve issues.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
118 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Oct 2012
- Finished
-
Feb 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologic confirmation of invasive breast cancer * Stage: Clinical T1 \>/= 1.0 cm, T2 or T3, N0-3, M0 * HER2 negative * ER and PgR status by immunohistochemistry must be known. ER positive patients are allowed if physicain has determined neoadjuvant chemo is appropriate. * Life expectancy greater than six months * Use of an effective means of contraception is required Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Prior anthracycline or platinum based therapy * Prior treatment for the current breast cancer, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiation or experimental therapy * Ipsilateral breast recurrence, unless prior treatment consisted of excision alone for DCIS or breast-conserving treatment and hormonal therapy for DCIS or invasive cancer * Peripheral neuropathy of any etiology that exceeds grade 1 * Significant hearing loss * Renal dysfunction * Use of other investigational or study agents * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to study drugs * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness * Any condition that would prohibit administration of corticosteroids * Uncontrolled diabetes * Pre-existing medical condition that would represent toxicity in excess of grade 1 as measured by CTCAE (unless not considered medically significant by the physician) * Known HIV positive individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Breast cancer are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
-
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States
-
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
-
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
-
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
-
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
-
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016-2698, United States
-
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center at Derby
Derby, Connecticut, 06418, United States
-
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center at Guilford
Guilford, Connecticut, 06437, United States
-
St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06105, United States
-
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
-
Women and Infants Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
-
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a faster radiation course match the standard one after breast reconstruction?
- Can High-Risk breast cancer patients skip an extra radiation boost?
- Radioactive probe lights up CD73 on breast tumors in PET scans
- Can time with horses help cancer patients feel better?
- Can an oral drug replace injections for advanced breast cancer?
- Can a common steroid shield breast cancer patients from a dangerous drug side effect?