New hope for brain bleed patients: could a simple embolization replace surgery?
NCT ID NCT06347796
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares a minimally invasive procedure called middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) to standard open surgery for treating chronic subdural hematoma, a type of brain bleed. About 520 moderately symptomatic adults aged 40-90 will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. The main goal is to see if MMAE reduces the need for additional rescue surgery or death, while also checking its safety.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 520 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Feb 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 40-90 years inclusively. 2. Per CT of the head, (one of the following): Unilateral convexity CSDH measuring at least 10 mm in thickness OR Bilateral CSDH if only one side is considered for treatment (at least 10 mm in thickness) and the contralateral side is asymptomatic and \< 10 mm in thickness. 3. CSDH at least 2/3 isodense or hypodense, verified on axial CT slice used to measure the thickness of the qualifying CSDH. 4. Qualifying baseline head CT performed within the 7 days prior to randomization. 5. Able to undergo assigned treatment within 72 hours after randomization. 6. Patient or legally authorized representative agrees to be randomized, and provides written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Secondary cause apart from trauma for the qualifying SDH, such as an underlying vascular abnormality or tumor. 2. Tentorial or interhemispheric SDH. 3. Secondary to CSDH, MRC of 0, 1, 2, or 3 in any muscle group contralateral to the side of the CSDH 4. 4. Pre CSDH mRS of 5 or higher. 5. Secondary to CSDH, patient is unable to complete TUG (i.e.,TUG \> 120 seconds, unable to walk, or tries TUG but quits in ≤ 120 seconds). Note: This criterion does not apply if the patient does not complete TUG for reason other than CSDH. 6. Secondary to CSDH, ASR of 0, 1, or 2. 7. Emergent surgical evacuation such as open craniotomy, burr hole drainage, or Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) is required for the patient. 8. Unable to withhold all antiplatelet agents or OACs for the first 7 days after randomization. 9. Indication that withdrawal of care will be implemented for the qualifying SDH. 10. Prior surgical treatment for CSDH if the surgery is less than 30 days prior to randomization. 11. On tranexamic acid. 12. Platelet count of \<100,000 per microliter refractory to transfusion. 13. Coagulopathy that cannot be corrected to an INR of ≤1.5. 14. Known contraindications to angiography. 15. Known intolerance to occlusion procedures. 16. Known vascular anatomy (small artery size) or blood flow (high vascular resistance peripheral to the feeding arteries) that precludes catheter placement or embolic agent (Embosphere Microspheres or CONTOUR particles) injection. 17. Known presence of collateral vessel pathways potentially endangering normal territories or cranial nerves during embolization. 18. Known large diameter arteriovenous shunt, i.e., where the blood does not pass through an arterial/capillary/venous transition but directly from an artery to a vein or presence of patent extra-to-intracranial anastomoses (where study embolization devices could pass directly into the internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, or intracranial vasculature) that cannot be addressed with coil embolization. 19. Patient has a known active systemic infection or sepsis. 20. Patient is pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating. 21. Life expectancy of less than 6 months due to comorbid terminal conditions. 22. Concurrent participation in another research protocol for investigation of an experimental therapy. 23. Known or suspected to not be able to comply with the study protocol. 24. For unilateral CSDH, no measurable deficit secondary to the CSDH on the Timed Up and Go \[TUG\], Aphasia Severity Rating \[ASR\], or MRC. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the TUG is defined as: time ≥10 seconds. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the ASR is defined as: a score ≤4. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the MRC is defined as: a score \< 5 in any muscle group contralateral to the site of the CSDH. 25. For bilateral CSDH, no measurable deficit secondary to the treatment-eligible CSDH on the ASR or MRC. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the ASR is defined as: a score ≤4. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the MRC is defined as: a score \< 5 in any muscle group contralateral to the treatment-eligibile CSDH side.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic subdural hematoma are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
29 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville
RECRUITINGJacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
RECRUITINGBoston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
-
Brigham and Women's Hospital
RECRUITINGBoston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
-
Cooper University Hospital
RECRUITINGCamden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
-
Emory University
RECRUITINGAtlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
-
Good Samaritan Hospital
RECRUITINGCincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
-
Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
RECRUITINGNew York, New York, 10029, United States
-
JFK Neuroscience Institute, JFK University Medical Center
RECRUITINGEdison, New Jersey, 08820, United States
-
Massachusetts General Hospital
RECRUITINGBoston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
-
Mayo Clinic Arizona
RECRUITINGPhoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States
-
Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGToledo, Ohio, 43608, United States
-
Montefiore Medical Center
RECRUITINGThe Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
-
Philadelphia Neurological Institute
RECRUITINGUpland, Pennsylvania, 19013, United States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RECRUITINGNewark, New Jersey, 07101, United States
-
SUNY Upstate Medical University
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGSyracuse, New York, 13210, United States
-
UT Southwestern Medical Center
RECRUITINGDallas, Texas, 75390, United States
-
University of Kansas Medical Center
RECRUITINGKansas City, Kansas, 61660, United States
-
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
RECRUITINGMiami, Florida, 33136, United States
-
University of Minnesota
WITHDRAWNMinneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
-
University of Missouri Healthcare
RECRUITINGColumbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
-
University of Pennyslvania
RECRUITINGPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
-
University of South Florida
RECRUITINGTampa, Florida, 33617, United States
-
University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston
RECRUITINGHouston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio
RECRUITINGSan Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
-
University of Texas Medical Branch
RECRUITINGGalveston, Texas, 77555, United States
-
University of Utah
RECRUITINGSalt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
-
University of Virginia
RECRUITINGCharlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
-
University of Washington
RECRUITINGSeattle, Washington, 98104, United States
-
Wake Forest University
RECRUITINGWinston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
-
Washington University, St. Louis
RECRUITINGSt Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
-
Westchester Medical Center
RECRUITINGValhalla, New York, 10595, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- China builds national watchdog for brain blood vessel devices
- Blocking a scalp artery could replace surgery for bleeding on the brain
- Which embolic agent works best for brain bleeding? a trial aims to find out
- Can a tiny artery block stop brain bleeds from coming back?
- Can we predict frailty in serious illness? a large study investigates
- Brain bleed surgery: does the drill site matter?