Could a Heart-Lung machine at the scene of a cardiac arrest double survival?
NCT ID NCT07679737
First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 02, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at whether giving people a heart-lung machine (ECPR) right where they collapse from a cardiac arrest can help more of them survive to leave the hospital. Researchers will compare people who get this extra treatment with those who get standard CPR and care. The study includes adults who had a witnessed cardiac arrest, got bystander CPR, and did not recover quickly with standard efforts.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a way to save more people who suffer a cardiac arrest outside a hospital.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a randomized trial, so results may be less reliable. ECPR carries risks like bleeding or infection, and it may not improve survival.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 250 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the metropolitan regions of Sydney and Melbourne.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Witnessed cardiac arrest * Bystander CPR * Refractory cardiac arrest (failure to achieve sustained ROSC \>20 minutes) * Initial cardiac rhythm VF, VT or PEA * Within the hours of prehospital ECPR service operation Exclusion Criteria: * Initial cardiac rhythm asystole * ROSC with sustained recovery * Unable to reach the patient and commence cannulation within 45 minutes of onset of arrest * Evidence of/suspected end-stage disease: * severe disability impairing activities of daily living * end-stage organ disease - cardiac, liver, lung, renal * other life-limiting diseases, e.g. malignancy, terminal illness * advance health care directive * Time periods of advanced public health restrictions in Victoria and NSW due to COVID-19
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Monash University
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could better phone training save more cardiac arrest victims?
- A needle in the neck to shock the heart back to life?
- Can tracking body heat during cardiac arrest improve survival?
- Can emergency response predict heart restart? a new study investigates
- Can big data unlock the secrets of cardiac arrest survival?
- Double shocks: could two defibrillators save more cardiac arrest patients?