Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

C-Section skin closure showdown: staples may beat stitches

NCT ID NCT07167199

Symptom relief Sponsor: Inova Health Care Services Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will compare two methods of closing the skin after a cesarean delivery: absorbable staples placed under the skin versus traditional hand-sewn stitches. About 237 women having a C-section will be randomly assigned to one method. The goal is to see which technique is faster and leads to a better-looking scar.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
subcuticular absorbable staple (Insorb device) vs subcuticular monocryl suture
What this could lead to
If it works, this could give women a faster C-section closure with better-looking scars.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial comparing two existing methods, so the difference may be minor or not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 237 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Aug 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Sep 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 50 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * 18-50 years of age * Women ≥ 24 weeks viable gestation * Will be undergoing cesarean delivery Exclusion Criteria: * Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent. * No or very limited prenatal care or a non-resident patient who is unlikely to follow-up after delivery. * Immunosuppressed subjects: i.e., taking systemic immunosuppressant or steroids (e.g. transplant subjects; not including steroids for lung maturity), HIV with CD4 \<200, or other * Decision not to have skin closure (e.g. secondary wound closure, mesh closure) * Current skin infection * Coagulopathy * High likelihood of additional surgical procedure beyond cesarean (e.g. scheduled hysterectomy, tubal ligation, bowel or adnexal surgery) * Incarcerated individuals * Intraamniotic infection * Subjects participating on other treatment trials or studies that would interfere with the current study's primary outcome.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pregnancy are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Pregnancy

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Inova Fairfax Medical Campus

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.