Please sign in to follow a disease.
Can better Decision-Making save heart attack victims in shock?
NCT ID NCT05800951
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at how doctors treat people having a severe heart attack complicated by cardiogenic shock, where the heart can't pump enough blood. Researchers will track 124 patients at 20 U.S. hospitals to see how decisions about using mechanical heart support devices affect survival. The goal is to learn which escalation strategies work best, not to test a new drug or device.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- mechanical circulatory support devices
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors make better decisions about when and how to escalate support for heart attack patients in shock, potentially improving survival rates.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment test, so it won't directly prove a new therapy works. Results may vary across hospitals and might not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
124 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients who present with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) prior to PCI.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of acute AMI confirmed by a medical professional, with changes in serum biomarkers or evidence of ischemic EKG changes (STEMI or NSTEMI). 2. Cardiogenic Shock present as defined by the presence of 2 OR MORE of the following criteria prior to PCI: * Hypotension: systolic blood pressure ≤ 90mmHg at baseline (prior to PCI) or the use of inotropes or vasopressors to maintain SBP ≥ 90mmHg * Evidence of end organ hypoperfusion: elevated serum lactate levels (venous or arterial), cool extremities, oliguria/anuria * Hemodynamic criteria: Cardiac Index of \< 2.2 L/min/m2 or a cardiac power output (CPO) of ≤ 0.6 watts 3. Patient underwent PCI within 12 hours of hospital presentation. Exclusion Registry Exclusion Criteria: AMICS patients who meet any of the following study exclusion criteria will have a limited set of data collected via a single-page Patient Exclusion Form completed and submitted within 45 days of hospital discharge, which includes the reason for exclusion, date of index PCI, and assessment of patient survival to hospital discharge: 1. Evidence of Anoxic Brain Injury 2. Unwitnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest or any cardiac arrest in which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved within 30 minutes 3. IABP placed prior to MCS 4. Septic, anaphylactic, hemorrhagic, and neurologic causes of shock 5. Non-ischemic causes of shock/hypotension (pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, myocarditis, tamponade, etc.) 6. Active bleeding for which MCS is contraindicated 7. Recent major surgery for which MCS is contraindicated 8. Mechanical complications of AMI (acute ventricular septal defect (VSD) or acute papillary muscle rupture) 9. Known left ventricular thrombus for which MCS is contraindicated 10. Mechanical aortic prosthetic valve 11. Contraindication to intravenous systemic anticoagulation which precludes placement of MCS.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute myocardial infarction are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ascenion St. John Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
-
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37916, United States
-
George Washington University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
-
Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
-
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
-
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, United States
-
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
-
Methodist Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
-
Northside Hospital Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
-
Parkwest Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37923, United States
-
Providence St. Joseph Hospital Orange
Orange, California, 92868, United States
-
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
-
Spectrum Health Hospitals Fred and Lena Meijer Heart Center
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, United States
-
St. Anthony Hospital
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228, United States
-
St. Elizabeth Edgewood Hospital
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017, United States
-
TriStar Centennial Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
-
UVA University Hospital
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Every minute counts: study tracks how delays shape heart attack survival
- Stick-On patch aims to catch dangerous heart decline sooner
- Heart pump timing put to the test in deadly heart attack shock
- A second chance for the heart: can rehab rewrite the story after shock?
- Blood filter may calm the deadly inflammation of cardiogenic shock
- Microscopic blood vessel health may hold key to cardiogenic shock survival