Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a simple scan replace invasive heart imaging before bypass surgery?

NCT ID NCT07769008

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 17, 2026 · Last updated Aug 20, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This trial tests whether planning coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using a non-invasive CT scan (CCTA) works as well as the standard invasive angiography (CAG). About 826 people with blocked heart arteries will be randomly assigned to have their surgery planned with one of the two imaging methods. The main goal is to compare major heart-related events within one year, such as heart attacks, strokes, and repeat procedures. If CCTA proves non-inferior, it could offer a safer, more comfortable alternative for surgical planning.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a surgical planning tool
What this could lead to
If successful, this could make bypass surgery planning less invasive and more accessible, potentially reducing risks and improving recovery.
What could go wrong
The trial is still in progress, and results may not show non-inferiority. CCTA may miss details that invasive angiography captures, and the approach may not suit all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 826 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Aug 2026

Expected to finish

Aug 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Referred to CABG treatment Exclusion Criteria: * Under the age of 18 years * Unable to provide informed consent * Emergency CABG * Redo-CABG * Prior PCI with coronary stent implantation * Cardiogenic shock * Unable to undergo CAG or CCTA examination or deemed unsuitable by the investigator, such as: Known allergy to iodinated contrast media; Active hyperthyroidism or uncontrolled thyroid disease; Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m²; Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response or severe arrhythmias not amenable to rate control; * Pregnancy, lactation, or childbearing potential without effective contraception in female participants * Concurrent participation in another interventional trial

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary angiography (CAG) are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    RECRUITING

    Shanghai, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.